So this whole Washington One risk assessment thing they have going on is suppose to calculate one’s risk level, so they say? But at the same time, one’s risk level determines if your able to let’s say, get a job wile incarcerated. If one is doing everything right, and what their supposed to do. Then that person is classified in a low risk category meaning that one is not a high priority for employment, nor education? If prison reform is a priority, why not start at the prosecution level first? How about we look into why there is a high prosecution percentage mirrored by appeals as well. The public should be more aware of where their tax dollars are going instead of just assuming that it’s being put to good use.

Tremayne Reed
DOC #829485