BY: Christopher J. Smith (A606.559) POLITICAL PRISONER & ACTIVIST
Ladies and Gentalmen welcome to ( PMNG ) Prison Media Network Group, first off I just want to express to everyone to do your research in Learning your States Criminal Revised Codes and Criminal/Civil Procedures because our Law Enforcement officers & Criminal Justice system have been violating our Constitutional Rights to Due Process and Equal Protection because we African-Americans, Latinos, and Muslims have not been investing time in with each other to educate ourself of the Law regarding the Procedures govern for State officials to follow… Listen everyone the research part is easy, just take notes from my situation like for instance “2921.52” & Criminal Rule 4. (D)(3) (A)(1); once you get going you will then have A better overstanding of Law and recognize the unlawful practices of Law used against us by our Government officials. Once you Start your research you will find it to be fun and wont be able to stop because other things will pop up that will have you on edge like “our Government officials are the real criminals in violating & breaking the law.”… Now back to the topic in hand, we are now in the 4th segment into Cincinnati OHio’s criminal justices system and Law Enforcements extreme malicious practices of Law… This segment involves the FIRST APPELLANT DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, Judges: CUNNINGHAM, SUNDERMANN, & HENDON… Springfield Township Police officer Lieutenant DAVID SCHAEFER and the HAMILTON COUNTY CORNORS OFFICE Mr. WILLIAM R. HARRY… The purpose of me writing this Blog is because I am innocent and I need help in order to help others, and I want to educate the importance to everyone about really reading An reviewing your paperwork regarding Fraudulent Government documentations used against you and I. Speaking as A victim, I have revealed unlawful practices of Government corruptions regarding their use of Sham Legal Process… Sham Legal Process involving obstruction of justice to FALSE MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE, insufficient Service of Process involving Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, FRAUD committed in the procurement of jurisdiction where An order/judgment is based on A void order/judgment being the result of Fraud, misrepresentation & misconduct by the PERSECUTING party which is the State Of OHio. For almost (11) eleven years thus far I have been unlawfully and wrongfully held against my will in Prison for A crime I did not commit June 9th 2008… So I am here to present to everyone more hidden facts that was withheld by the State of OHio Government in covering things up by systematically using WILLIAM R. HARRY of the Hamilton County Cornors office to Sabotage by form as A Hoax against my personal property [SHOE] in what its called Advanced Procedural Fraud in producing FALSE MANUFACTURED DNA EVIDENCE in which this obstruction can be seen knowingly within William R. Harry crime Laboratory report, buried inside this report William R. Harry submitted evidence related to my innocence Which the State of OHio withheld from the jury of my Trial to which the jury failed to review… Ladies and Gentalmen lets begin… Defendant, Christopher J. Smith was walking down Galbraith Road unknowingly towards A crime scene coming from the Williamsburg Apartments when he [chris] was stopped and encountered by Police, Police advised Chris to not go any further towards the scene due to A shooting incident investigation. Christopher J. Smith was wearing A white Tee-shirt, Red Pelle Pelle Shorts with Red & Black Air Force 2 Jordan gym shoes. Several officers previously addressed that Chris [Defendant] “he’s been in the area for A while,” he may fit the physical description, but wasn’t the description police or K-9 unit wasn’t looking for and tracking. Walking bystanders by the names of Micheal Jones and girlfriend Heather Nunamaker, were walking right by the defendant onanother block called Compton Road away from the crime scene when Micheal heard defendant Chris, shout out for them to stop. Chris relayed Information provided by his previous stop by Law enforcement and that it was not probably safe to be out shopping right now in the area. Considering what Chris was providing to be true, Micheal and Heather did not go in that direction of the shooting investigation. Micheal and Heather returned home and later called Springfield Police Department NOT TO REPORT A CRIME of any sort, but to report their encounter with Chris. Micheal gave police that description of Chris which is A entirely unrelated situation and descripton police was already aware of.
Springfield Township Police sergeant Clayton Smith received A
Description from the call made by Micheal Jones of Chris. As officer Clayton Smith begun the search for Chris, [unrelated to the shooting] Clayton Smith saw that description of Chris who was walking up Compton Road, officer Clayton Smith based on his “HUNCH” says it was UNUSUAL for him to see A BLACK MALE walking in the area. So without PROBABLE CAUSE, Clayton Smith stopped Chris to question him during the night, being the only two alone, Chris became Nervous of being harmed. Clayton Smith asked Chris where was he coming from and officer Clayton Smith claims that Chris seemed evasive and nervous as he was talking so Clayton Smith felt uneasy about Chris and put him in handcuffs then explained to Chris that, “you’re not under arrest, you are only being detained.” Clayton Smith drove Chris into the Crime scene for A show-up where witnesses informed Clayton Smith that Chris was not the person who committed the crime. Instead of releasing Chris at the time, Clayton Smith continued his fiefdom and lied to Chris by saying to him that “other officers would like to speak with you back at the Station.”
June 9th 2008 Detective Aaron Fitzgerald was outside of the restaurant processing the crime scene, Fitzgerald testified see.,[Trial Transcripts volume 4 of 7 Page 645]; that to his recollection the eyewitnesses to the crime were gone, and that A show-up did not occur because Chris never did get out of the vehicle. Aaron Fitzgerald made these statementswhen that testimony is clear PERJURY. Reviewing of the INVESTIGATION REPORT generated by Fitzgerald under False Crime Scene Incident Report Case No:2008-00363 clearly stated as Quot: “that the offender [Chris] agreed to be taken back to the scene, [?] Chris was the scene for A show-up and was shown to witnesses one at A time separately.” CLEAR WRITTEN FACTS OF PERJURY! The First District Court of Appeals Judges Cunningham, Sundermann, & Hendon made A claim that Clayton Smith Testified that he took Chris to the restaurant to turn him over to Lieutenant David Scheafer when their perceptual is clearly A judgement who’s BAFFLING THE FACTS! Also see, [Motion To Suppress Evidence Page 78]; David Scheafer testified as Quot: “At one point in time (Clayton Smith) they made the determinaton that [Chris] the individual was going to be brought back to Springfield Township Police.” but hear that yall… Reviewing the Investigation Report, Aaron Fitzgerald stated as Quot: “Christopher agreed to come back to the police station [?] to be interviewed about the shooting incident.” [?] but, Christoph testified see, [Trial Transcript volume 6 of 7 Pages 1025-1026]; stated As Quot: “That I was handcuffed and FORCED to the police station and I didn’t want to talk with officers anyway… and that Clayton read me my Rights during the initial stop and detainment” Christopher explained to the Court that the seizure of his persons was wrong! Lieutenant David Scheafer Testified once Chris was brought to the station see,[Trial Transcripts volume 3 of 7 Page 506]; stated as Quot: “that initially I saw [Chris] him via close-circuit Television camera, and then after that, subsequently, I did go back into that room and observe and talk to the suspect.” David Schaefer.., yall listen used his GUN to forcibly seize my shoes and socks against my will inside of that Police Station! David Schaefer testified see.,[Trial Transcripts vol 3 of 7 Pages 514-517]; that he kept Christopher’s shoes physically, because Schaefer didn’t want to lose custody of them inside of the police station [?] so he held the shoes while walking around with them in his Possession, Detective Robert Merkle testified see.,[Trial Transcripts vol 4 of 7 Page 666]; that he observed the allege substance on the shoes, then Fitzgerald and Merkle left David Schaefer there with the shoes and went to talk to Christopher. Detective Aaron Fitzgerald testified see.,[Trial Transcripts vol 4 of 7 Page 621]; that when he got to the Station the shoes were in possession of Lieutenant David Schaefer he was by our dispatch area of the Police Department, in his possession. Fitzgerald also testified As to what room David Schaefer had taken Christopher Smith shoes, Fitzgerald stated as Quot: “its not really A room, its A Hallway an adjacent Hallway to our dispatch area,” Fitzgerald Says, “that portion of the police department is not videotaped.” See.,[Trial Transcript vol 4 of 7 Page 624]… Also see.,[Trial Transcript vol 5 of 7 Page 724]; Detective Robert Merkle testified As Quot: David Schaefer had shown me the shoes outside of dispatch, there is A Hallway that gos to the briefing area and I don’t think so that the area is recorded on video.” David Schaefer claims his reasons for taking Christopher shoes were that, “everything was going pretty much “Routine” with the inspection until I glanced down at his right shoe, and IMMEDIATELY I saw fluid droppings, kind of like if you would place your hand in A glass of water and you flick it, it appeared that you know it had Dropped and fallen on his shoe.” see., [Transcript volume 3 of 7 Pages 509-510]; also see.,[Transcript vol 3 of 7 Page 511]; David Schaefer says as Quot: “it was freash blood, fresh blood has kind of A shine to it and you could tell it wasn’t disturbed with any type of dirt or excessive wear that would have been caused IF IT WAS THERE FOR SOMETIME.” Listen yall David Schaefer just contradicted himself, let me tell you how!… The shooting incident occurred around 9:30p.m., and Christopher was not A Suspect to the K-9 unit at the corner of Galbraith and Roland Avenue where police called off the search at 10:20p.m., Christopher was Stopped the fourth time by police and taken to the crime scene around 11:45p.m., on A Hot and Humid, Dry summer night Temperatures of 80 degrees, with blood specks allegedly the size of A “Pin Head” IMMEDIATELY APPARENT, fresh and shiny on Red & Black shoes should have been DRY! Very Big Flaw in Schaefer’s Testimony yall! But hold up hold up yall hold up listen to this… Prosecutor Guess who? Katherine Pridemore then asked David Schaefer… “and how bright was it [the blood] or how red, or what color was it?” See.,[Trial Transcript vol 3 of 7 Page 511]; Schaefer responds as Quot: “it wasn’t really bright because of How DARK the shoe is, but it was very obvious that it just appeared there within A reasonable amount of time, and it was blood.” ASTONISHING! Because it was just planted almost 3 hours after the crime stupid LOUT just told on himself! David Schaefer just told on himself yall… Here he claims OH the blood drops was “IMMEDIATELY” apparent “it was blood fresh and shiny” small pin head drops on A shoe 3 Hours after A crime, but contradicted himself by saying this yall… “it wasn’t really bright because of how dark the shoe is” …”WHAT?” What the Fuck! What… The… Fuck! Clearly Aaron Fitzgerald, Prosecutor Katherine Pridemore and David Schaefer falsely orchestrated this whole case against me yall! An now we got the Court of Appeals baffling the facts saying their word is crediable.
In addition to the many statements David Schaefer testified to, he also testified, see.,[Trial Transcript vol 3 of 7 Page 494]; that actually his main duty is ADMINISTRATIVE, and Oversees the VIDEO SURVEILLANCE within the Police Department, and Oversees the INVESTIGATIVE UNIT as Well as Overseeing Dispatchers, Clerks, and Assistants. As we all now know David Schaefer is the key player who orchestrated this As far as David Schaefer’s position at the Police Station he was
consciously aware of his acts while using his firearm agains shoes in that processing room and he was also aware that his claim of seeing blood drops on my right side shoe that was immediately apparent, would have been terribly flawed on video surveillance. David Schaefer then admits at Trial that he knew his actions would have been on video at that point in time! See.,[Trial Transcript vol 3 of 7 Pages 524- 526]; Thats when Prosecutor Katherine Pridemore Testified on behalf of the State of OHio that the State DESTROYED THE EVIDENCE! See.,[ Trial Transcript vol 5 of 7 Page 733]; Detective Aaron Fitzgerald and Robert Merkle testified that, see.,[Trial Transcript vol 4 of 7 Page 623]; they did not think of taking any pictures of this blood claim because the shoes were not in they’re custody and care…[WHAT?] Also see.,[Trial Transcript Vol 5 of 7 Page 724]; Robert Merkle testified as Quot: “we were shown the shoes by David Schaefer, and was told to get back and talk to Christopher Smith.” So as we all know, No pictures was taking June 9th 2008 of me shoes which is A big hole in the states case structure and foundation! As A Lieutenant, David Schaefer acted from purely personal motivation during his assigned duties which oversees the investigative unit and duties over the administrative operations in covering up his and Detective Aaron Fitzgerald own crimes in wrongful acts against Christopher Smith. David Schaefer took the shoes, and Aaron Fitzgerald with blood on his own shoes created A case on Christopher, they had this whole thing figured out, as they thought, the perfect fall guy. David Schaefer deliberately for this flawed reason did not follow criminal procedures pursuant to in violaton of 2933.32 (a)(b)(c) and (E)(2) of the OHio Revised Code As A malicious cover up by neglecting his official duties As his way of executing Sham Legal Process by means of
excerting his obstruction oppose to any evidence, by demonstrating its David Schaefer’s word against Christopher Smith LIFE! Being the lead investigator over investigations, David Schaefer’s deceitful exploits were A Sham act to send A innoceny man to prison, As well as it meant to form some protective lying to prevent discovery of they’re acts in transferring DNA blood evidence in planting A crime on Christopher Smith Shoe. The First Appellate District Court of Appeals Judges: Cunningham, Sundermann, & Hendon [Appeal Case No:C090335]; are A prime example of executing what is called POLITICAL SUPREMACY PRACTICES of RADICALISIM… When you have A officer who admits that his main purpose for stopping Christopher Smith, “that it was unusual for him to see A BLACK MALE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD walking and that the officer felt was out of place” DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PROBABLE CAUSE! Thats is called ETHNIC DISCRIMINATION! The First District Court of Appeals Judges CUNNINGHAM SUNDERMANN & HENDON improperly applied the Law to those facts of such SERVITUDE! What A person seeks to preserves as private, even in An area accessible to the public shall be Constitutionally Protected under the Fourth Amendment. As well as his or her persons, where ever A man may be, We shall be entitled to know that we shall remain free from unreasonable arrest searches and seizures, and Christopher Smith was denied those rights before and after being transported to the crime scene for A show up, So for the First District Court of Appeals to improperly apply Probable Cause to anything contrary was simply Impish and degradationous. The Court of Appeals enigma to Baffle that Christopher had DNA evidence on his Persons when he was stopped by officer Clayton Smith, the Courts perceptual without A doubt go’s UNPRECEDENTED! Officer Clayton Smith NEVER STATED THAT CHRISTOPHER HAD ANY BLOOD ON HIS PERSONS! Although the Court of Appeals seditious practice was to deprecate Christopher’s defense when the totality of the FACTS and Circumstances DID NOT SUPPORT PROBABLE CAUSE when the most DAMAGING, CRITICAL fact against the State of OHio, in FAVOR FOR THE DEFENSE, is that the K-9 UNIT was at close encounter with CHRISTOPHER and DID NOT ATTACK HIM OR INFORMED agents that Christopher was the suspect! See.,[Defense 911 Call Transcript]; Conclusive Proof Here Yall… But hear me out yall… The State of OHio Court of Appeals Judges Cunningham, Sundermann, & Hendon nonsensically stated the Trial court concluded that the seizure of Christopher shoes was proper because I Christopher Smith had consented to the seizure when I stated for the record I was held and forced against my will!!! The Court of Appeal Judges had the audacity to FALSELY state that the encounters with bystandareds Michael Jones and Heather with Christopher who advised them that it isn’t safe to walk in the area of the crime scene added “WEIGHT” to the States case!?!? HOW? But hold on yall hold on listen to this right here peep this… Public Defender Jerome J. Grogan for Christopher Smith asked Officer David Schaefer: “did you at that point or Any time Photograph or take any pictures do you think that would have been A great idea?”… David Schaefer responds as Quot: “No, I did not, I can’t recollect why I didn’t think of it SIX MONTHS AGO, just about any instance when you’re MONDAYS QUARTERBACK there are CERTAIN THINGS YOU DO, YOU ALWAYS EVALUATE WHAT YOU’RE DOING.” See., [Trial Transcript vol 3 of 7 Pages 524-526]; Clearly Schaefer orchestrated this whole thing and evaluated his actions from being sought from the very beginning, due to David Schaefer’s many positions of authority Schaefer made it his duty to unlawfully use SHAM LEGAL PROCESS to act Corruptively BY OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE.
The State of OHio First District Court of Appeals Judges Cunningham, Sundermann, & Hendon Poisonously Stated after “allegedlly” reviewed the entire record they cannot conclude that the jurys verdicts were against the manifest weight of the evidence, because Christopher offered no credible support for his theory that the blood either had been PLANTED on his shoe or had TRANSFERRED there ACCIDENTALLY!?!?… “WHAT!” REALLY? Christopher J. Smith presented the testimony of Forensic Expert LARRY DEHUS of Law Science Technologies. Lar testified that the Police did not follow proper protocol when Tampering and Altering away the allege substance on the shoe. Now in reference, Pursuant to Section (D) of Page (2) of the REPORT generated by Larry Dehus who Stated that the bloodstains appeared to be consistent with low to medium velocity blood spatters, that the DIRECTION of the blood Droppings on the shoe is INCONSISTENT WITH HAVING DROPPED FROM ABOVE! IN OTHER WORDS THE BLOOD SPATTERS CAME FROM BELOW! David Schaefer ADMITS at Trial that “if you would place your hand in A glass of water and you would FLICK IT, it appeared that you dropped and fallen on his shoe that way.” Detective Aaron Fitzgerald clearly stated during the interrongation as Quot: “I know I have got blood on my shoes right now because I have been walking on the floor with all the victims blood on my shoes, okey, I realize that.”
Hypothetically, Detective Aaron Fitzgerald and David Schaefer just incriminated themself again and given us the very answer to the very same QUESTION that the State of OHio First District Court Of Appeals Judges Cunningham, Sundermann, and Hendon Pathologically HOG- WASHED and emasculated that I CHRISTOPHER J. SMITH offered No credible support for “my theory” that the blood either had been PLANTED on my shoe or TRANSFERRED there accidentally… First of all What Police done to me was NOT A ACCIDENT Judge Cunningham, Sundermann, and Hendon had you all would have really reviewed the RECORD JUDGE!!! YOU WOULD HAVE SOUGHT THAT. Let me guess you all don’t know how to read or comprehend? Here some advice for you STOP THE POLITICAL SUPREMACY PRACTICES AGAINST AFRICAN- AMERICANS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICES SYSTEM AND STOP BREAKING THE LAW TO OUR CIVIL RIGHTS… I Christopher J. Smith has been vigorously presenting since DAY ONE OF MY TRIAL and Stated that POLICE OF SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. HAD PLANTED EVIDENCE ON MY SHOE AND THATS ON THE RECORD!!!! Review it! Also see.,[Trial Transcript volume 6 of 7 Pages 1042-1045]; I AM INNOCENT! Ladies and Gentalmen, to all my readers reading this I got more proof that will have you on the edge of your seat, cut throat REAL FACTS to false manufactured Forensic DNA evidence enclosed by William R. Harry himself generated by the Hamilton County Cornors Office Crime Laboratory… Prosecutor Katherine E. Pridemore withheld DNA documentational evidence from the defense at my Trial where I had to argue to review the reports the State did not want me to see, okey, after A few words the State let me review the States DNA report while I was on the Stand because the Trial Judge John Andrew West maliciously Denied my Motion to Suppress Evidence so they were before my very eyes was just screwing me around… So while I was on the Stand during my Trial Prosecutor Katherine Pridemore gave me the States DNA report So while the jury was watching me read this report, the GSR test came back NEGATIVE As I fast forward to the DNA report generated by William R. Harry under Lab report No:6131-02… I came across A hand written Note slipped in its report buried inbetween the papers Dated on date 7/7/2008 by William R. Harry who Stated As Quot: “there was no samples on The shoe for The FBI CODIS PROGRAM amplifier to be identified”… In secrecy my defense Attorney Jerome J. Grogan, Tag this As Exhibit Number 5 but never spoke about this at my Trial! I found this document since Ive been in Prison and noticed the Fraud committed within all the State of OHio’s documentations use against me… See Prosecutor Katherine Pridemore’s down fall was that she was being “SUPERFICIAL” only concerned with whats apparent on its face to pursuade the jury but failed to Actually review the report for the DOUBLE CROSS by William R. Harry who stabbed her right in the back! As I was reading the report on the Stand I kept saying on the record this is false this is false and Katherine Pridemore kept distracting me from fully reading the report by telling the Judge to systematically making me To stop reading to upset me so they can take A court room break to take back their report from me! For the First Appellate District Court of Appeals judges Cunningham, Sundermann, & Hendon to render A judgement Stating I did not offer credible support… Means they never really even evaluated the record… As They Claim to Have. Remember Ladies & Gentalmen to all my readers silence to corruption is A
indication of Betrayal to our civilization and the greatest mistake you can make is living in constant fear that you will make one for speaking up… What These Appeal Judges excersied against me was An example of malicious PERSECUTONS and Judgements resulting from
institutionalized individual prejudice which was their own way of distinctively expressing FASCIM! Remember everyone, that somewhere theres A written report or government documentation showing the frequency of their errors… Its the one thing you can count on in any Government Bureaucracy, they keep RECORDs on EVERYTHING including Their own OBSTRUCTIONS. I Am Innocent and need Help, I Am now 31 years old and cant fight this system alone… And though it all I also ask that everyone pay close Attention to your paperwork. African-American Civil Rights Leader Malcolam. X stated “Education is our passport to the Furture, for tomorrow belongs to the people who prepare for it Today.
#AN WE RISE
Christopher J. Smith #a606.559
Toledo Correctional Institution
2001 East Central Avenue
Toledo OHio 43608
or e-mail at http://www.JPay.com
